Last night I went back and had a crazy hand. One of the best reads if not the best read I've made in my life. Here's my description of it:
I got AQ suited (spades) in the big blind on my first hand on the new table with 600 behind. Four people limped and I raised to $60. One guy called and the flop came 10 high with two hearts. I believe it was 56T. I continuation bet $75 to see where I was at and the other player called. The turn was a 9 of diamonds and I looked at my stack, thought about going all in but eventually bet 100 with about 350 behind. He asked me how much I had left and then raised 150 more. I thought for a long time and couldn't put him on any hands that were on the board. If he has the flop beat, or if he even has a 10, then he would have raised me on the flop. If he flopped a set, he would have raised me on the flop for two purposes (1) hoping that I had an overpair and would push or (2) to get me off a possible flush draw. If he was strong enough to beat the board or even if he had top pair, he would have put me all-in at some point with the flush draw and assuming that I have two overs. I think his read was good in the fact that I had AQ and he was pretty sure I was weak but he misplayed the hand and my read was good also. Also I took into heavy consideration the fact that he didn't raise pre-flop, he limp called. Because of that the only hand ranges that I could put him on that would hit the flop would be A-10 suited, 55 or 66. I don't think he even calls with 56 suited or QT/KT suited. The only hand that I really considered would have me beat the way he played it was J10 suited. That's the only hand that he would smooth call me on the flop with to get a read. If he has A-10, K-10, 55 or 66 he's raising me on the flop. So now I put him on a flush draw and went all-in for like 200 more. He called pretty quickly actually and the 10 of hearts hit the river. I thought I was dead to a flush but when I showed he mucked. He must have had QJ.
By the way, this shirt is money in the bank:
Session 1 (9/24/07): +$15 (10.75 Hrs.)
Session 2 (9/25/07): +$2010 (2.25 Hrs.)
Session 3 (9/28/07): +$910 (3.25 Hrs.)
Session 4 (9/29/07): -$500 (2 Hrs.)
Session 5 (9/30/07): +$2131 (7 Hrs.)
Session 6 (10/01/07): +435 (7 Hrs.)
Session 7 (10/05/07): +910 (3 Hrs.)
Session 8 (10/08/07): -742 (3.75 Hrs.)
Session 9 (10/09/07): +280 (4 Hrs.)
Overall: +$5449 (43 Hrs.)
Hourly: $126.72
Home Games/Props: -$15
$100 NL: +$265
$200 NL: -$192
$400 NL: +$5376
Session 2 (9/25/07): +$2010 (2.25 Hrs.)
Session 3 (9/28/07): +$910 (3.25 Hrs.)
Session 4 (9/29/07): -$500 (2 Hrs.)
Session 5 (9/30/07): +$2131 (7 Hrs.)
Session 6 (10/01/07): +435 (7 Hrs.)
Session 7 (10/05/07): +910 (3 Hrs.)
Session 8 (10/08/07): -742 (3.75 Hrs.)
Session 9 (10/09/07): +280 (4 Hrs.)
Overall: +$5449 (43 Hrs.)
Hourly: $126.72
Home Games/Props: -$15
$100 NL: +$265
$200 NL: -$192
$400 NL: +$5376
3 comments:
you have to put him on a stone cold bluff to pull that off. great read, btw what casino are you playing at?
daddypoker
Hollywood Park. Yeah, I was actually thinking about this hand again and I guess he could have had 99 but I think if he has anything really he's going to put me all-in on the turn. The 150 raise was just weird to me.
i thought you were still in seattle playing in one of those tribe casinos.
Post a Comment